Vis-CAT 
The Visual Cognition Assessment Tool
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News & Updates
  • Early Intervention
  • Contact Us
  • Parents
  • Teacher
  • Research Foundations
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • News & Updates
    • Early Intervention
    • Contact Us
    • Parents
    • Teacher
    • Research Foundations
Vis-CAT 
The Visual Cognition Assessment Tool
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News & Updates
  • Early Intervention
  • Contact Us
  • Parents
  • Teacher
  • Research Foundations

RESEARCH FOUNDATIONS

This page is intended to openly share the science behind visual processing and the thinking that informs Vis-CAT. Research in this space spans education, psychology, neuroscience, and vision science, and the language used can vary across disciplines. Our goal is to help bring clarity to these ideas, support a shared understanding, and explain how Vis-CAT works, including the dot-pattern research developed by Dr Christine Nearchou. 


We also take time to explain commonly used terms that can be confusing or used differently across fields, so that parents, educators, and researchers can engage with the evidence more easily and confidently.

Frequently Asked Questions

Visual processing differences (VPD) refer to difficulties in how the brain interprets, makes sense of, and uses visual information, even when eyesight (visual acuity) is normal. In other words, the eyes may see clearly, but the brain has trouble making sense of what is seen.  These differences sit at the intersection of vision, attention, cognition, and learning, and they are especially relevant in children’s development and education.


 Vision processing differences (VPD) are described using many overlapping terms because they span medicine, neuroscience, psychology, education, and allied health; each field has its own language for similar functional visual challenges. Terms such as visual processing disorder, cortical visual impairment, non-verbal learning difficulties, and visual–spatial or visual–cognitive challenges often reflect perspective rather than distinct conditions. 


Traditionally, vision has been framed narrowly around eye health and clarity of eyesight, while learning and cognition have been addressed separately. As a result, difficulties in interpreting, integrating, and using visual information for learning have been inconsistently labelled. Increasingly, these challenges are recognised as differences in functional visual access rather than a single diagnosis. Vis-CAT® aligns with this view by focusing on how children use their vision to interpret visual information and support attention, learning, and participation, thereby cutting across these overlapping terms, enabling early identification and intervention of challenges. 


Recent research shows that visual processing differences are real, brain-based differences in how visual information is interpreted, not problems with eyesight or effort. Studies using brain imaging and behavioural testing show that some children have difficulty with the brain systems that support visual–spatial understanding, attention, and visual memory, which can affect learning in areas like reading, maths, handwriting, and organisation. 


Importantly, these differences can exist even when eyesight tests are normal and intelligence is typical or high. Researchers are also refining how these difficulties are defined such as reframing Nonverbal Learning Disability as Developmental Visual Spatial Disorder (DVSD) and developing better tools to identify children earlier, when targeted support can have the greatest impact.


DVSD is different from both eye and attention problems. Children with DVSD usually have normal eyesight and pass standard eye tests—the difficulty lies in how the brain processes and makes sense of visual–spatial information, such as understanding layouts, relationships, and visual organisation. It is also not primarily an attention disorder: children may seem inattentive or overwhelmed, but this is often because visually complex tasks require much more effort, not because they can’t focus in general. In short, eyesight problems affect how clearly the eyes see, attention problems affect the ability to focus, and DVSD affects how the brain interprets visual–spatial information.


Vis-CAT fits in as an early identification and screening tool for visual–spatial processing differences. While standard eye tests assess how clearly a child sees, and behavioural checklists focus on attention or learning, Vis-CAT is designed to tap directly into visual–spatial attention and processing skills that are often missed in routine assessments. By providing a simple, child-friendly way to detect early markers of visual–spatial difficulty, Vis-CAT helps identify children who may be at risk for challenges such as DVSD, allowing support to be put in place earlier—before learning difficulties become entrenched.


Vis-CAT is grounded in vision science and clinical research, building on the Novel Dot Pattern Assessment (NDPA) developed by Dr. Christine Nearchou and her team, which has been trialled in school settings and clinics to identify early visual–spatial processing differences in children. The NDPA research demonstrated that this task reliably highlights challenges in visual–spatial attention that standard eye tests often miss. Drawing on these validated methods, Vis-CAT has been piloted in real-world educational and clinical settings to ensure it is child-friendly, engaging, and practical, with data collected and analysed to refine scoring and interpretation. Designed as an evidence-informed early screening tool rather than a diagnostic test, Vis-CAT helps detect potential visual–spatial difficulties and enables timely referrals and support programs.


Want more information on the research? Click on the link below:

Link to Journal


Fellow Experts

 This section highlights researchers and practitioners we have come across who are working to better understand Visual Processing Differences. We share their work to support learning, connection, and collaboration across the field of visual cognition and learning. 

Kerrie Neophytou

Dr. Angelea Perez

Dr. Angelea Perez

 Kerrie is an Education Leader with over 25 years of expertise in special needs education and learning diversity. She has held multiple leadership roles within the education sector and is currently the Head of Campus at an independent school in Melbourne. 



Find Out More

Dr. Angelea Perez

Dr. Angelea Perez

Dr. Angelea Perez

Dr Angelea (Angel) Perez is a Vision Scientist (PhD) specialising in early childhood vision, functional vision, and CVI. With 15+ years’ experience, she bridges research and practice, developing birth-to-3 screening programmes, shaping policy, and advancing evidence-based approaches to prevent avoidable vision loss.

FIND OUT MORE

Relevant Research Papers

Work Group on Nonverbal Learning Disability

Fisher, P. W., Litwin, H. D., Riddle, M. A., & Margolis, A. E. (2025) 

Journal -  Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry  

Report of a Work Group on Nonverbal Learning Disability: Consensus Criteria for Developmental Visual-Spatial Disorder, a Reconceptualization of Nonverbal Learning Disability for DSM Consideration 


Link to Journal

Visuo-spatial attention deficit in children with reading difficulties

Franceschini, S., Bertoni, S., Puccio, G., Gori, S., Termine, C., & Facoetti, A. (2022).  

Journal - Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-10 


This research shows that some reading difficulties are linked not only to sound and language skills, but also to how children visually focus and organise information. Using a simple maze activity, the study found that many children with reading challenges also had differences in visual attention. The findings suggest that reading support works best when it addresses both language skills and visual attention. 


Link to Journal

Estimated Prevalence of Nonverbal Learning Disability Among North American Children and Adolescents.

Margolis, A. E., Broitman, J., Davis, J. M., Alexander, L., Hamilton, A., Liao, Z., Banker, S., Thomas, L., Ramphal, B., Salum, G. A., Merikangas, K., Goldsmith, J., Paus, T., Keyes, K., & Milham, M. P. (2020) 

Journal - JAMA Netw Open, 3(4), e202551 


This study showed that 2.2 million to 2.9 million children and adolescents may have nonverbal learning disability in North America based on a study of 2596 children; further studies appear to be needed to develop and test interventions for treatment of this disorder. 


Link to Journal

Hiding in plain sight: children with visual perceptual difficulties in schools.

McDowell, N., St Clair Tracy, H., Blaikie, A., Ravenscroft, J., & Dutton, G. N. (2024).   

Journal - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 18, 1496730.


This review explains that some children can have normal eyesight on tests but still struggle to process what they see, especially in busy classrooms (often linked to CVI). Because schools focus heavily on visual acuity, many children go undiagnosed or are misunderstood. The paper calls for better awareness, broader assessment (including parent/teacher observations), and practical classroom supports like reducing visual clutter.


Link to Journal

A Novel Test for Visual Cognition in Children

Nearchou, C. (2022) 

Journal - Vision Development & Rehabilitation 8(4). 


This study aimed to test the Novel Dot Pattern’s potential as a cognition screen tool amongst children aged 5 to 12.  The normative data and percentile scores of 

the three tests show a developmental trend in visual cognition. Therefore, NDPA can be used as a simple screening tool to screen for visual cognition deficits in children.


Link to Journal

Visual impediments to learning

Piquet, B. C. (2013) 

Journal - Optometry and Visual Performance,1(4). 


This paper shows that many children struggle with reading and learning due to hidden visual difficulties that are missed by standard eye tests. Problems with focusing, tracking, and eye coordination can affect attention, behaviour, and academic progress. The authors argue for early, comprehensive vision assessments so children are properly supported and not misdiagnosed.


Link to Journal

Vision and academic performance in primary school children

 Wood, J. M., Black, A. A., Hopkins, S., & White, S. L. J. (2018) 

Journal -  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 38(5), 516-524 


Performance on the horizontal and vertical DEM subtests was most strongly associated with academic performance. These data, in conjunction with other clinical data, can provide useful information to clinicians regarding their prescribing and management philosophy for children with lower levels of uncorrected refractive error and binocular vision anomalies.


Link to Journal

A Window of Opportunity: Vision Screening in Infants and Toddlers for the Prevention of Visual Impai

 Perez, A. (2026) 


Vis-CAT aligns directly with the evidence-based need identified in her review for developmentally appropriate, functionally meaningful vision screening in early childhood.  It highlights the limitations of instrument-only approaches, where functional vision, visual engagement, and neurodevelopmental processing are not captured by photo-screening. 

 

Link to Journal

Vision, Language and Learning Early Visual Experience as a Foundation for Language and Learning

 Perez, A. (2026) 


This paper provides the conceptual rationale for Vis-CAT in that Vis-CAT enables early identification for vision challenges and makes this paper’s framework actionable within early childhood and educational settings.  

 

Link to Journal


Copyright © 2026 Vis-CAT:  The Visual Cognition Assessment Tool - All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept